|
SPEECHES
/ STATEMENTS
PMs address at the Inauguration
of the 10th Delhi Sustainable Development Summit
February 5, 2010, New Delhi
I am truly honoured to have this unique opportunity
to address such a prestigious gathering of government
leaders, civil society activists, academics and scientists
from around the world. The Delhi Sustainable Development
Summit celebrates its 10th anniversary today and with
each passing year it has become an increasingly important
event on the international environment and climate change
calendar.
The Energy Research Institute, TERI, has, under the
able and far-sighted leadership of Dr. R.K. Pachauri,
earned well-deserved respect and international acclaim
for its contributions to the global effort in meeting
the twin challenges of energy security and climate change.
Excellencies, distinguished guests, this Summit takes
place at an important juncture in the international
deliberations aimed at forging a multilateral understanding
on how to deal with climate change. Moving forward,
we need to reflect on the lessons of what happened at
Copenhagen.
I share the disappointment of many with the limited
achievements of the discussions that took place at Copenhagen.
At the same time it is important to ensure that we can
deliver what we promise to do. An ambitious agreement
that is observed only in the breach will discredit the
whole process. The Copenhagen Accord, which we fully
support and will take forward, is a catalogue of voluntary
commitments and not a negotiated set of legal obligations.
Presumably the countries that have made the commitments
willingly have assured themselves that they can be and
will be fulfilled. A modest accord that is fully implemented
may be better than an ambitious one that falls seriously
short of its targets. This is the lesson that was learnt
with regard to the Kyoto Protocol.
Secondly, the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change (UNFCCC) has to be the centerpiece of
global cooperation on climate issues. The purpose of
the Copenhagen Accord is to contribute to the negotiations
on the Kyoto Protocol and on Long Term Cooperation.
It is not a substitute but a complement to these core
international agreements. There is much in the Copenhagen
Accord that can bring consensus on the two-track negotiating
process. For this to happen, this process itself has
to recommence in right earnest, perhaps from March this
year.
Thirdly, a successful international agreement will
require a consensus in two crucial areas. The first
is on the science of climate change. The second is the
ethical framework for giving expression to the central
UNFCCC principle of common but differentiated
responsibility.
Some aspects of the science that is reflected in the
work of the IPCC have faced criticism. But this debate
does not challenge the core projections of the IPCC
about the impact of greenhouse gas accumulations on
temperature, rainfall and sea level rise. Let me here
assert that India has full confidence in the IPCC process
and its leadership and will support it in every way
that it can.
One of the Missions under our National Action Plan
is on Strategic Knowledge for Climate Change to promote
high quality and focused research on various aspects
of climate change.
We have established an Indian Network for Comprehensive
Climate Change Assessment, a network of over 120 research
institutes, which will bring out regular reports on
the impacts of climate change on different sectors and
different regions of the country. The first such assessment
will be released in November this year. We seek international
collaboration to make this network effective.
We are also establishing a National Institute of Himalayan
Glaciology in Dehra Dun and we look forward to international
cooperation in this vital area.
However, even in the absence of unanimity of scientific
opinion, many of the actions related to mitigation and
adaptation are those we should be taking anyway because
of their collateral benefits.
The lack of global consensus on burden sharing is an
even greater barrier to securing an agreement. Industrialised
countries in our view need to recognise more clearly
their historical role in the accumulation of greenhouse
gases in the atmosphere. They should respond with bolder
initiatives to contain their future emissions. I would
also urge greater financial and technical assistance
to developing countries both for adaptation measures
to cope with the consequences of these emissions; and
for mitigation to reduce their contribution to future
emissions.
Developing countries also need to do their bit. I wish
to assure this distinguished gathering that India will
spare no effort in contributing to the success of the
post-Copenhagen process. The least developed countries
and small island states deserve special attention due
to their greater vulnerability to climate change. India
will support all measures to assist them, both bilaterally
as well as in the context of a global climate change
regime.
We recently convened a meeting in New Delhi of the
Ministers dealing with Climate Change from Brazil, China,
South Africa and India. The aim of the meeting was to
carry forward the positive and constructive role the
four countries played at Copenhagen. We wish to contribute,
together with our G-77 partners, to a comprehensive,
balanced and above all equitable outcome in Mexico based
on the principles of common but differentiated responsibility
and respective capabilities.
We will therefore participate in the negotiations in
a spirit of flexibility, acknowledging our responsibilities
as citizens of the globe. It is in this spirit that
India, and the other BASIC countries, conveyed our respective
voluntary mitigation actions to the UNFCCC by 31st of
January this year. In our case it is our endeavour to
reduce emissions intensity of our GDP by 20-25% by 2020
on 2005 basic levels. We are also very serious about
fulfilling and perhaps even exceeding this target.
In the case of developing countries, climate action
has to be combined with their central developmental
goals. In a poor country like India, where hope and
deprivation co-exist, sustainable development requires
that the needs of the present are given at least as
much attention as the needs of the future.
Climate action that delays or makes more difficult
the basic task of poverty eradication will be difficult
to implement. That is why in our National Action Plan
on Climate Change, we have given priority to those activities
that mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and also deliver
substantial collateral benefits by reducing poverty
or by improving local environmental quality and human
health.
We recognise that we have to adopt a different model
of growth to that followed by the industrialized countries.
But a lot of effort is needed to operationalise the
meaning and precise content of sustainable development.
The Planning Commission of India has recently set up
an Expert Group to prepare a strategy on a low carbon
economy in India. The Group will have to work out a
holistic approach that takes on board concerns of all
stakeholders - industry, transportation, power, labour,
micro and small industry and agriculture well in time
before we embark on our Twelfth Five Year Plan from
April, 2012.
India has already committed itself to a path of sustainable
development based on a graduated shift to the extent
possible from the use of fossil fuels to renewable and
clean energy, including nuclear energy.
Within the ambit of our National Action Plan on Climate
Change, India has already unveiled one of the worlds
most ambitious plans for promoting solar energy, targeting
an installed capacity of 20,000 MW by the year 2022.
We will soon launch an ambitious National Mission on
Enhanced Energy Efficiency that will put in place an
innovative policy and regulatory regime to unlock the
market for energy efficiency, estimated at over US$
15 billion. It is expected that the initiative will
lead to avoidance of capacity addition of nearly 20,000
MW and reduced carbon dioxide emissions of almost 99
million tonnes.
India has around 22% of its land area under forests.
This is significant, given Indias growing population
and high population density and this sequesters around
10% of our annual greenhouse gas emissions. Our objective
over the next decade will be to increase not just the
quantity but the quality of our forest cover, since
about 40% of it is degraded forest with little tree
canopy and cover. This will enable us to at least maintain
this level of carbon sequestration even as we maintain
an 8-9% annual rate of real GDP growth.
It is becoming clear that the roots of the problem
we face today are in the current patterns of global
production and consumption, which are not sustainable.
We are living on an overdraft on Natures resources
and this is already threatening the ecological balance,
which is the basis of our survival. It is my earnest
hope that you will approach your deliberations over
the next few days, mindful of the challenge we face,
not as nations divided by frontiers, but as a world
united as one common humankind. With these words, I
once again welcome you to Delhi and thank you for giving
me a patient hearing.
|